July 24, 2012

Doctors and patients would be affected by Obamacare changes.Even before the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare, Medicaid was already “financially unsustainable and administratively unworkable.”

Now, with the Supreme Court’s ruling that Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion mandate is unconstitutional, the law is on an even “faster pace to collapse,” explains Heritage expert Nina Owcharenko.

And because “half of the reduction in uninsured ‘promised’ under the law was based on mandating that states expand Medicaid,” Obamacare will cover fewer people than advertised.

States “should not buckle under this pressure” to expand their Medicaid programs, Owcharenko argues.  Medicaid programs are already struggling in many states to cover costs and to provide quality services. Even with federal support, expanding programs will strain already tight state budgets.

Do you think states should expand Medicaid programs? 

Comments (25)

Al Horning - July 24, 2012

No! The states should not expand their Medicare programs,

michele - July 24, 2012

ONLY for the true citizens of this Country and when I say “true” I mean born on our soil to American citizens

Edward Sobus - July 24, 2012

It is time to pull the plug. We can no longer afford this unfunded mandate. Time for the freeloaders to step up and find a job or create one. The days of the free ride are over. We just can’t afford more of the drain on our economy. It may sound cruel, but it is pay your own way now. Nobody can afford to take care of you cradle to grave. Time to grow up and accept responsibility for your own self.

Ellen Burton - July 24, 2012

Absolutely no expansion of Medicaid program. Most docs do not take medicaid patients anyway. People may be insured with Obamacare, but they will not receive healthcare. Doctors are abandoning their practices. Wake up.

Agnes Tillerson - July 24, 2012

There is too much fraud, corruption and care given to illegals now. This system is broken and expanding it will not fix this system. Expansion will place a tremendous impact on the State budgets which are in dire trouble now. Health Savings Accounts should be available to legal citizens and Medicaid abolished!

Victress Jenkins - July 24, 2012

The states should run medicaid their own way. Arizona’s AHCCCS program has done a very good job helping the less fortunate with their medical care.

Lil C. - July 24, 2012

Why?

john uhrhammer - July 24, 2012

I think each state has to make it’s own way! The federal government has way too much power that rightly belongs to the states! Reduce the federal government drastically. FIRE all czars immediately. Get rid of EPA and federal involvement in education. Build the oil pipeline from Canada!

Linda Prescott - July 24, 2012

No, states should not expand their Medicaid programs. Each and every state (with the possible exception of North Dakota, which is doing fine!), should be expanding JOBS!

john - July 24, 2012

when you have a country that spends significantly more than they take in (KNOWN AS DEFICIT), it is just a matter of time before there is a total collapse. the federal government treasuries are almost a 0%. Where will the creditablility be for the future

Russ Morgan - July 24, 2012

No. Medicaid/Medicare and the entire medical care system needs to be redone. States should refuse to cooperate with foolish government overreaching and expansionism in healthcare.

James & Lois Bronson - July 24, 2012

absolutely not……..they are talking that way in the TN Govenors office……..we should be cutting back not adding on……

Vincent Adeszko - July 24, 2012

No. The states need to balance their budgets and not enable government to grow beyond its contitutional limits. Dealing with poverty is the business of charity – not government. Government involvement expands poverty, grows itself and diminshes the free exercise of religion contrary to the 1st Amendment.

Jim Bratten, Evansville, IN - July 24, 2012

Medicaid needs to be completely handed off to the states: THEY control it for THEIR citizens. There is NO constitutional basis for Medicaid, let alone Medicare.
The states can decide between themselves if they want to endorse a “carry” privilege across states lines, making it portable through state compacts. Keep the feds OUT of it. The closer the system gets to the voter, the better. The citizens of the state decide how large or small it will be; simple for extreme emergencies or more expansive for progressive enclaves like Illinois, NY or California. If they want it, THEY pick up the tab, not a taxpayer seven states away…

John Hazeltine - July 25, 2012

I can only comment on California, where I live. Our state can’t afford more entitlement expenses including this one.

Denny Converse - July 25, 2012

I agree that Medicare should only be expanded by those states that can truely finance and support the program. Are there any states? Certainly not Illinois.

Anthony Landry - July 25, 2012

I believe Medicare was put into place to help those over 65 after they retire, since a lot of the cost of our coverage come out of our SS checks,I feel we deserve it. maybe I am wrong, but we have paid for it through our years of hard work. I believe the distrustion of Medicare come from all of those who get free who never worked a day in there lives and get as good a coverage as I do or better.Those who have paid taxes and get SS checks, over 65 get Medicare, those who have not worked and are not over 65, well send them back to there country to get fixed.We cannot continue to take care of the whole world on our tax dollar.

J E Houser - July 25, 2012

No.

Roberta Peterson - July 25, 2012

No! States should concentrate on doing only those things that cannot be done by individuals, just as our constitution has stated. If taxes were cut and policies of obstruction were deleted, more businesses would form and people would be able to find work and have money to take care of their health care.

Donna Lewis - July 25, 2012

No, the states already have so many people on medicaid now that they are in financial straits. We don’t need the government taking care of more & more people.

Kim - July 25, 2012

States should not have the federal government dicatating how to spend their money. The Feds need to be stripped of their power and cut back to the nub. This country is getting to be a scary place. Too bad most of us citizens have never had to live under tyranny. We are walking into it like a herd of sheep walking off a cliff. Illegals should not have ANY benefits. If they need emergency medical help. then let medicaid pay the hosp bills. But they should have to pay a large copay. Not totally free health care. Make Mexico take care of their own indigent.

Elna Hughes - July 25, 2012

Absolutely not — in fact, Medicaid needs to be trimmed – there are people on Medicaid who committed fraud to get on – they need to be discharged and jailed . We have illegals who are on Medicaid with false ID’s ( stolen ) and they need to be deported . Why the government has allowed criminals to get free care at our expense is beyond understanding and it has to stop..! The elderly poor and the disabled DO need Medicaid – however, the ones who need it most often don’t get the help.

Richard Dubberly, LaCrosse, Fla. - July 26, 2012

NO!

Anne Flint - July 26, 2012

Absolutely Not! We have enough Debt! Besides the Liberals will be out in November and Obamacare will die the deserved death it so deserves!

elder care services - April 22, 2013

Whoa! Mega enlightening document. I’m just saving this site at the moment. Thanks much!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>