June 4, 2014

Many of the claims made to support the Export-Import Bank, which subsidizes big businesses and foreign governments, are “groundless,” Heritage Foundation economist Salim Furth explains in the Wall Street Journal:

A sense of fairness and knowledge of economics teach me to oppose subsidies by default. In this case, the recipients of the subsidy are hoping to persuade Congress to make an exception from fairness and logic on empirical grounds. But the empirical claims they make–that Ex-Im supports small business and that Ex-Im’s subsidies create jobs–are groundless.

Heritage’s Diane Katz points out that while trade benefits the economy, the Ex-Im Bank’s subsidies are costing jobs.

Do you think Congress should reauthorize the Export-Import Bank?

Comments (1)

American Citizen - June 4, 2014

The American government should support Americans…not the rest of the world! We need a new congress who will help all Americans…and stop looking out for themselves!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>