October 9, 2012

Last week, federal officials arrested 11 people for attempting to smuggle sophisticated and sensitive electronics to Russia. These electronics are used to detonate triggers and guide weapons.

This is the second such espionage threat discovered in two years. In 2010, the FBI arrested 11 Russian “suburban” agents for espionage.

These events demonstrate that espionage remains a very real threat, one that cannot be countered with ”reluctant enforcement as well as lax persecution,” The Heritage Foundation’s Ariel Cohen and Dmitri Titoff explain:

The incident with the Houston firm shows that for Russia, human intelligence remains an important tool of Russian spying. Military technology procurement was and is an important part of espionage—not just for Russia, but also for China and even an ally like France. However, it is the scope and the brazenness of the current Russian operation which makes this FBI success outstanding.

According to senior intelligence officials, Russia is stepping up espionage worldwide. Open societies of the U.S. and Western Europe are traditional high-priority targets. In particular, computer networks are increasingly employed to spy. Why spend millions of dollars and years on deep penetrations, when Russian hackers—among the best in the world—can download terabytes of data in seconds?

In November 2011, a U.S. intelligence report to Congress warned that foreign intelligence agencies, especially in China and Russia, are accelerating their efforts to steal sensitive technology data from U.S. companies through cyberspace. Cyber-espionage is even harder to track than HUMINT (human intelligence).

The New York indictments clearly demonstrate that Cold War habits die hard, especially in Russia—happy blather about the “reset” policy notwithstanding.

Do you think Russian espionage is a serious threat?

Comments (8)

cactusbob - October 11, 2012

You betcha I think Russian espionage is a serious threat! The only thing that would make it not a threat is if Obama gets reelected. Then there would be no need for espionage, Obama will then give the Russians everything they might want.

Dennis Reicks - October 11, 2012

Russia will always remanin a threat regardless of who is in the White House. Putin and whoever succeeds him, for years to come, will want to domminate the world.

Stephen Larner - October 11, 2012

Silly question! That is like asking if mammals breath air. They don’t have and they have no ethics about taking what they want (that is the basis of Socialism/Communism).

Lyle Friedman - October 11, 2012

Has been and still is a major threat…from personal experience some 50 years ago I tell you security is a major problem: lax security by individuals and corporations. I’ve seen top secret docs, classified papers etal left on desks over night, during lunch hour etc at a highly sensitive government research facility where I had access to classified documennts. What do we know about obama’s hot mike exchange and visit to Iran during his champaign?

Judy Gitchel - October 11, 2012

Intelligence gathering has ALWAYS been critical to our interests around the world and therefore everybody else in the world is a threat to our security. I had hoped by now that this had gotten through the bureaucracy that it would be part of the culture of every part of government. Secrets must be kept and protected from our enemies in particular but some things don’t belong to our friends either. Obama will give everything away. He should not be privy to most intelligence briefings.

Gregory Wofford - October 11, 2012

Russia is still the same country they just “reset” the names. Putin is a soviet style dictator no doubt. Freedom of the press is gone if you do not toe the line you end up dead. Putin is a old KGB agent he has not changed. He is still a thug.

Antonio Occhino - October 12, 2012

They were are and always will be no matter who the president is. However Obama’s open mike comment really scares me. I just feel it in my bones, he will make it easier for them to do as they wish. The man cannot be trusted to do anything except hurt this country’s future in every respect.

Holly Chapo - October 14, 2012

Undoubtedly!! Just because Gorbachev took down the wall is no reason to believe the Russian leadership has changed. They just as autocratic and hungry to dominate as they ever were.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>