September 14, 2012

There is a common misperception that imports from overseas cost jobs here at home. However, recent Heritage Foundation research shows that the process of importing goods actually contributes to a large number of jobs, when taking into account long-term effects.

For example, jobs created in the process of transporting imported goods from point of entry to their final destination stimulate various fields such as wholesale, transportation, sales, and retail. Heritage experts Derek Scissors, Charlotte Espinoza and Terry Miller explain that “Over half a million American jobs are supported by imports of Chinese-made clothes and toys alone.”

A healthy economy relies on trade. When imports go up, unemployment goes down. This leads to more choices, and most importantly fosters competition that improves the quality of goods and services, further encouraging consumption.

With this in mind, policymakers should limit regulations on imports and create policies that encourage commerce between the United States and other countries. Furthermore, continued progress needs to be made to properly measure trade’s effects on employment because, as Heritage research has found, the root of trade misperceptions lies in the data:

The first flaw is with the trade data themselves. The way trade is almost always measured gives full credit to the country that sends the final shipment: The full value of a computer assembled in China counts as a Chinese export. Though typically, the only part of the computer trade process that occurs in China is the manual assembly of the parts. The value added to China’s economy is tiny, as are the workers’ salaries. Yet China gets credit for the entire process in the trade accounts, and its export figures are very high.

In a difficult economy, it is essential for politicians to understand the critical correlation between imports and job creation. To learn more about the positive impact of imports and to view this research, please click here.

Do you think politicians should focus their efforts on limiting barriers to commerce?

Comments (18)

Jack Potter - September 14, 2012

Fantastic article. Simple Economic concept that people tend to forget

Brandon - September 14, 2012

Interesting spin on an issue that everyone seems to have already formed biases about…good work!

Matt Sandoval - September 15, 2012

YES. Great Article

interested reader - September 15, 2012

great insight, love the writing style and am going to keep following Mr. Osgouei

Forrest - September 17, 2012

It is time for politicians to be required to study economics if they are going to legislate the economy. Great points made here!

William M Snedden - September 18, 2012

I disagree with the general notion that imports contribute to American jobs. I think that those jobs referenced by the “experts” would still be needed if those same products were made in Vermont or Ohio! The impression given is that these supporting imports do not already exist here. I sincerely doubt that. I have the feeling that it takes a lot more jobs to make products (and support the industry) than it does to sell and move them BUT if we BOTH make and sell and then service those products, there is no way that importing stuff would be contributing to our number of jobs! My contention is that the number of jobs LOST because products are now made elsewhere is MUCH greater than jobs jobs leftover for transportation & sales of those same products.

Ellen - September 18, 2012

We must not limit any kind of commerce be it import or export. Both importing and exporting help our economy which in turn helps create jobs.

Patriot Lady - September 18, 2012

I would much rather buy American made products than anything from a foreign country. Our people deserve the jobs, they make a better product, & we don’t have to be worried about what toxic garbage has been used in making the item. Frankly, I just don’t trust other countries so I don’t care how cheap the stuff is.

John Smith - September 19, 2012

I think that both imports and USA commerce are needed. The article above shows the importance of trade, especially in the departments of wholesale and retail. Also some countries are better at certain categories of products than we are. As for American made goods, they are also needed if we are to repay the debt and they add even more jobs, too (think “Keystone Pipeline”). Barriers on ALL aspects of commerce should be limited (most probably eliminated). After all, a free market can’t be called “free” with all these barriers and weights.

The only time when a barrier should exist is when a foreign country starts doing bad things, like what Iran is doing lately.

Also, countries that abuse trade and corrupt data, such as China, should be held more accountable (I have had bad experiences with them when it comes to counterfeit stuff).

Lura L Hacker - September 19, 2012

More trade!

Jeff Yetter - September 20, 2012

Commerce, both internal and external, are key to this nation’s economic well being. Americans are free, as they should be, to buy cheap, imported, crap.
The relevant issue here is the stifling burden placed on internal commerce by a government bureaucracy bent on both vampirically sucking the vitality out of, and regulatory stricture of, any and all business activities.

Robert Seklemian - September 20, 2012

We import foreign-made goods because they are cheaper and/or better than equivalent home-grown goods. Our consumers benefit with a higher standard of living and are able to spent the saved funds on other products which, in turn, increases demand and provides additional local jobs. Yes, there may be some displacement of workers to jobs in industries in which we excell and in turn increase our production of goods for export. The total sum of the game is increased wealth for all of us!

Mike B. - September 20, 2012

Great article, key concept that will be playing a vital role in the next few months.

Matt Viel - September 21, 2012

Transporting and selling goods support domestic jobs, but so does manufacturing. If nails are made in China and sold in Tennessee then they need to be transported and sold. But if they’re made in Michigan and sold in Nevada then they still need to be trasported and sold. I would have liked to have seen a side by side comparison of total jobs created by imports compared to total jobs created by American manufacturing of similar products. I suspect that goods made locally and distribrutted domestically sustain many more jobs than goods made internaitonally and sitributed domestically. Are there facts or figures to contradict my argument?

John Liekus - September 22, 2012

This is a great article, people need to understand that free trade allows people to purchase the best quality or the best desirable product at the cheapest good. As a result, making society better. In addition, it helps other third world countries become developed. It’s the easiest and most simplest way to make society better.

Holly Chapo - September 22, 2012

No, they should understand the real dynamics of trade and support it. We all benefit.

Chris Campos - September 22, 2012

great insight, interesting article but I would love to see more detailed comparisons to domestic trade.

Mr. Fogarty - September 23, 2012

Great article, and a wonderful writing style. As much as I hate to admit it, free trade in the long term is better for both the world and for the people of the USA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>