November 16, 2012
To avoid indiscriminately slashing defense spending through the sequestration process, Congress should make deliberate spending reductions in other areas, Heritage Foundation scholar Patrick Knudsen writes in a new report.
Outlining $150 billion in savings, Knudsen explains that it’s high time Congress makes targeted spending cuts:
Instead of letting this crude mechanism substitute for Congress as a governing institution, lawmakers should do what they should have done months ago: replace these mindless across-the-board cuts with specific, targeted terminations and reductions. . .
Many of the proposed reforms and reductions are long overdue; others were developed in the House reconciliation bill that aimed at replacing the sequester. The point is: Savings are available if Congress has the will to act.
Read the appendix of Knudsen’s report for details on his $150 billion in proposed cuts, including reductions in energy and transportation subsidies, repealing portions of Obamacare, and reducing food stamp eligibility.
What would you cut from the federal budget?
Bill Beckham - November 16, 2012
I would cut the depts of Energy, Education, EPA, TSA, IRS, HHS, and all non essential services.