Skip ahead to page content

entitlements.jpg

Time to fund national defense

April 24, 2009 | By Nathaniel Ward

Conservatives should have done more to protect long-term defense spending during the recent budget debates, argues Heritage defense policy expert Mackenzie Eaglen.

2010 Budget Breakdown, Highlighting Defense

The current blueprint for the defense budget is targeted at saving money in the short run. But Eaglen warns that inadequate defense budgets could "actually cause the American taxpayer to spend billions more than necessary to sustain a military that is smaller than needed using equipment that is increasingly dated." This is exactly what happened when conservatives acquiesced to President Bill Clinton's defense budget cuts in the 1990s.

Even a modest increase of $27 billion in defense spending would have been "achievable and responsible," she argues. Yet both budget proposals offered by conservatives fell short of even that figure, though they exceeded the President's budget request.

In her in-depth report on defense spending (full report in PDF), Eaglen outlines the 11 fundamental building blocks for national defense. These, not short-term concerns, ought to guide Congress' military spending considerations:

  1. Strategic defense and deterrence
  2. Seizing and holding territory against organized ground forces
  3. Counterinsurgency capabilities
  4. Growing and modernizing the Reserve component
  5. Special Operations forces
  6. Air superiority
  7. Long-range bombing
  8. Projecting power through the maritime domain
  9. Space access and denial
  10. Deterring, protecting, denying, and attacking in cyberspace
  11. Global logistics

The Constitution tasks the federal government with providing for the common defense of the nation. The Founders did not qualify this task by limiting it to times of economic prosperity. Unfortunately, as Eaglen notes in her report, "uncertainty about the stability of the economy has prompted some Members of Congress to call for reducing the defense budget."

                                                                                                                              -Amanda Reinecker

Other Heritage work of note

  • Heritage energy experts Ben Lieberman and Nick Loris outline five reasons the EPA shouldn't try to combat global warming through its proposed regulations: 1) it would be "an economy killer"; 2) it would have "negligible environmental benefit"; 3) "the scientific consensus behind global warming, especially the seriousness of the impacts, is anything but strong"; 4) Congress has declined to act, so unelected bureaucrats shouldn't take matters into their own hands; 5) it would expand bureaucracy.
  • Heritage transportation expert Ron Utt and Rep. Jeff Flake have teamed up to tackle the unfair discrepancies created by a "perverse system of trickle-up economics." Federal transportation money significantly benefits wealthy states, such as New York, at the expense of less affluent "donor states." Utt and Flake call upon donor states, who send more fuel taxes to Washington than they ever receive in transportation funding, to band together and demand "their states' fair share of highway taxes."
  • Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) recently claimed that there were 17 socialists in Congress—but Heritage vice president Mike Franc, using self-pronounced socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders' voting record as the definition of socialism, identifies many more just in the Senate. "The center of gravity for today's liberal is much farther to the left than it has been at any time in our recent history," Franc argues.
  • Earth Day was this week, and Congress spent considerable time talking about "green jobs" and "frightening tales of impending eco-disaster," writes Heritage Distinguished Fellow Ernest Istook. Even scarier, Istook argues, the threat the proposed American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 poses to the already shaky economy.

In other news

  • The Congressional Budget Office predicts that Social Security beneficiaries, who enjoyed benefit increases in 2009, will not receive cost-of-living adjustments for 2010 and possibly beyond.
  • The Obama administration says it is not opposed to prosecuting Bush administration officials for giving legal advice on anti-terrorism tactics. This would be in effect an attempt by the new administration to prosecute its predecessor for policy disagreements.
  • A U.S. doctor claims to have successfully implanted eleven cloned human embryos in the wombs of four women. Scientists doubt his claims, while ethicists raised objections as well.

Coming up at Heritage

To attend these or any other events at Heritage please RSVP at Heritage's website. Or you can view these events live online. All times are Eastern.

Nathaniel Ward is the Editor of MyHeritage.org—a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation. Amanda Reinecker contributed to this report.