Skip ahead to page content

federal_budget_and_spending.jpg

Heritage responds to the State of the Union

January 30, 2008| By Nathaniel Ward

 

On Monday, President Bush delivered his final state of the Union address to Congress. His speech emphasized issues like Iraq and the economy, but touched on other areas as well.

» Read the text of the speech.

» Take our poll: Which issue should have received more attention from President Bush during his State of the Union address?

Heritage Foundation policy experts closely watched the speech and posted their reactions on The Foundry, Heritage’s weblog. Here are some excerpts of their comments:

  • Iraq. The State of the Union served as a reminder for the American people of the progress made in Iraq since the new surge strategy debuted last year under General Petraeus. Heritage experts point out that the American surge “helped to turn the tide.”
  • Health Care. President Bush “proposed sound policy” for health care reform, including reforming the tax treatment of health insurance and allowing the purchase of insurance across state lines.
  • Immigration. “Once again the president said all the right words” about immigration and border security. But we should remember that he said much the same thing last year. “The President needed to do more to send the right the signal on the kinds of legislation that Americans would both find acceptable and would actually solve the problem.”
  • Defense. When the war in Iraq winds down, some on the Left may want another “peace dividend” and cut spending on defense. “While the president did say Congress must fully fund defense and give the troops all they need—that is just not enough,” Heritage experts argue. “The United States must invest at least 4 percent of GDP on defense spending over the next decade to maintain a trained and ready force, pay for current operations, and modernize for the future. The president should have laid down a marker for long-term investment in defense to build the kind of military America needs for the long war.”
  • Intelligence. President Bush quite reasonably asked for an extension of Protect America Act, which gives intelligence agencies the tools they need to intercept terrorist communications. The measure expires at the end of the month.
  • Entitlements. The President quite rightly called on Congress “to address the coming tsunami of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid costs.”
  • Energy. “President Bush should be commended for recognizing the need to expand nuclear energy in the United States. As a CO2-free, safe and affordable source of energy, nuclear power can help reduce atmospheric emissions while meeting America’s growing energy demands.”
  • Technology. President Bush neglected to mention many of the important technology issues facing the nation. “Now, it’s not like Internet policy should trump the Iraq war or entitlement reform as a topic of interest,” Heritage experts explained. “But it’s also not like the field is devoid of important policy issues.”
  • Environment. President Bush quite rightly did not commit to a misguided legislative approach to global warming. “Such cap and trade bills would do more economic harm than environmental good, and it is best that this administration run out the clock on them rather than try to win 11th hour plaudits from environmentalists.”
  • Education. President Bush was right to call for expanded school choice, though he also urged reauthorization of No Child Left Behind, which “greatly expanded federal control in education, significantly increased education spending, and [imposed] testing policies that may be having unintended consequences in the states.”
  • Earmarks. President Bush plans to issue an executive order that directs federal agencies to ignore any future earmarks that aren’t voted on by Congress as a whole. This is a good start, “but it shouldn’t take an executive order for Congress and the Executive alike to know that committee reports cannot legally bind the President to allocate funds for pork projects.”
  • Free Enterprise. New agreements are pending with South Korea, Colombia and Panama. “Especially with the economic uncertainty today,” Heritage experts write, President Bush was right to highlight “the urgent need for Congress to focus on the economic growth these agreements will provide.”

Nathaniel Ward is the Editor of MyHeritage.org—a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation.