Skip ahead to page content

federal_budget_and_spending.jpg

Heritage helps secure Second Amendment rights

March 13, 2007 | By Nathaniel Ward

In a victory for individual civil rights and the original understanding of the Constitution, a federal appeals court last Friday overturned on Constitutional grounds the 30-year ban on DC residents’ possession of functional firearms in their homes in the nation’s capital—and Heritage Foundation experts helped secure this important victory.

In a two-to-one decision, a panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit held that a close reading of the Second Amendment indicates that “the right in question is individual” and that Washington, D.C.’s almost complete prohibition on handguns in the home is unconstitutional. You can read the whole opinion online in PDF format.

Todd Gaziano, director of Heritage’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, explained the ruling to Rob Bluey:

The plaintiffs were seeking the limited right to posses modern guns in their homes, keep them loaded, without trigger locks, and move them about their homes for purposes of self-defense. Such rights were specifically upheld as individual rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. To the extent D.C. ordinances forbade permits for such limited use, they were struck down as unconstitutional. (There are still many unresolved issues, however. I would think a permit or license will still be required. In the future, though, D.C. will not be allowed automatically to turn down an application by a law-abiding citizen for such use.)

Bluey is director of the Center for Media & Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

Heritage legal scholars helped the winning side prepare its case. For example, Heritage hosted an important “moot court,” or practice oral argument session, and other preparatory sessions to brief the primary advocates on strategy and Constitutional arguments.

A similar suit was dismissed by the same appellate court in 2005 because the plaintiffs were deemed not to have standing to challenge the D.C. gun ban. “This is a prime example of how a strategic approach to raising the right issues and in the right manner can make all the difference,” Gaziano explained.

City officials said they will appeal the decision to the full court.

The facts on federal spending

“Before the nation can come together on federal budget solutions, it has to agree on the basic budget facts,” Heritage budget expert Brian Riedl writes. To ensure Congress, the media and the American people are aware of these facts, Riedl and others in the domestic policy department at Heritage have pored over the government’s spending data and produced the latest edition of “Federal Spending—By the Numbers.”

Click here to read the disheartening numbers in Riedl’s latest report.

The stability of marriage

Liberals maintain that “alternative lifestyles” are “just as good” as traditional marriage. But is that really the case?

More social science reviewed by Heritage’s FamilyFacts.org indicates that cohabitation is a less stable form of relationship than marriage. “A 2003 study found that cohabiting relationships were less enduring during their early years than marriages,” the website reports. “Overall, cohabiting couples’ rate of separation was five times that of married couples.”

In other news

Coming up at Heritage

To attend these or any other Heritage Foundation events, RSVP at Heritage’s events website. Or you can watch these events live online at Heritage.org.  All times are Eastern.

Nathaniel Ward is the Editor of MyHeritage.org—a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation.