Investigate Haditha and continue the mission
June 6, 2006 | By Nathaniel Ward
The government should investigate allegations of war crimes, but that should not distract from the mission in Iraq.
A little over a week ago, the press began reporting that US Marines may have killed as many as two dozen Iraqi civilians during a raid on the Iraqi town of Haditha last November. These allegations, which Heritage’s James Carafano calls “deeply troubling,” are very serious indeed. The killing of innocent civilians is a war crime and should not be tolerated.
Investigations into the incident are underway. “A senior defense official told the Associated Press last month that evidence points to unprovoked killings by the Marines involved,” the AP reports. “A separate probe is examining whether there has been a coverup of the incident by the U.S. military.”
The military, Carafano writes, must conduct “an investigation that is transparent, thorough, and respects rather than undermines the efforts of the hundreds of thousands of American soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, and coastguardsmen who have served and will serve honorably in Iraq.”
To that end, Carafano also made three recommendations on how to proceed:
- The government’s investigations into the matter should be transparent and “government and military officials should announce what findings they can as soon as possible.”
- The military’s “operating procedures and training have to be scrutinized, and if shortfalls are found that materially contributed, they must be acknowledged. The military needs to be honest about its mistakes—and fix them.”
- “The United States government must continue to demonstrate resolve that, despite this incident, it will finish the mission in Iraq.”
If the allegations are true, they will prove to be a black mark on the record of the Marine Corps. Regardless of the outcome of the investigations, we must not let the behavior of a few bad apples distract us from the core mission in Iraq: victory.
Amnesty doesn’t work
That amnesty encourages future lawbreaking is more than just a theory, James Carafano reports in a separate paper. It’s a fact.
“Spain offered four amnesties for illegal immigrants between 1985 and 2000. None of them slowed the flow of undocumented migrants,” Carafano explains. Their most recent attempt, in 2005, was followed by a surge in illegal immigration from Africa.
“Illegal border crossing has been matched with a skyrocketing number of cases of fraud from individuals trying to qualify for amnesty,” he continues. This has “overwhelmed immigration officials, who have been unable to cope with processing, screening, and adjudicating the flood of amnesty applications.”
While immigration reform seems stalled for now—the House and Senate have yet to name members to the conference committee where a compromise bill would be worked out—it is important that they keep in mind the very real consequences of the policies they are considering.
Telling the public about a bad idea
The Senate is set to consider a thoroughly terrible idea in the coming days: the establishment of a separate government for “native” Hawaiians. The unconstitutional proposal would allow those deemed to be “native” Hawaiian by virtue of their ancestry to be subject to their own laws.
Heritage has been a leader on this issue, helping bring this debate to the fore.
- Ed Meese and Todd Gaziano of Heritage’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies examined the constitutionality and possible consequences of this idea last August, when it was last up for consideration.
- In early May, when it was clear the issue would again be taken up, Heritage’s Tim Chapman penned an article for Townhall.com noting the bill’s return.
- Two weeks ago, Heritage hosted a panel discussion on the legislation, with guests including Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and National Review senior editor Ramesh Ponnuru. The event, widely covered by blogs, was followed by a cover story on the issue in National Review.
- On May 31, Heritage President Ed Feulner penned an op-ed on the topic in The Chicago Sun-Times. This was closely followed by editorials citing Heritage’s work in The Washington Times and Investor’s Business Daily.
Just as bad as the proposal, though, is its premise: that native Hawaiians have been somehow “robbed” of their sovereignty by malicious Americans. This is a gross distortion of the facts, National Review’s Alston Ramsay explains. In fact, after the monarchy was overthrown in 1893, Hawaiians themselves pushed for annexation by the United States and then for statehood. In 1959, 99 percent of the population voted in the statehood plebiscite, with 94 percent backing the initiative.
Stay tuned to MyHeritage.org for the latest on this abomination.
- Forward this e-mail to five others—friends, family members, church members
- Encourage five friends to sign up for MyHeritage.org e-mails
Stifling the Internet
Congress is considering a proposal to impose onerous new restrictions and regulations on Internet providers. Called “net neutrality” by its supporters, this proposal would prevent companies from offering customers different levels of service at different prices, stymieing innovation and stifling investment in faster Internet connections for home users. To put it another way, this legislation would prohibit companies from offering better quality services at higher prices, limiting choice for consumers.
Advocates of this legislation worry that companies will abuse their ability to control Internet traffic to block certain services and websites and favor others. This worry is unfounded, as Heritage’s James Gattuso explains: “In today’s competitive broadband market, network abuse would quickly send consumers to another provider. Moreover, if a network owner somehow does abuse its power, existing competition law—with its decades of precedent—is more than sufficient to address the problem.”
Under this proposal, government would use its powers of regulation to help certain businesses, like Google and other big corporate backers of “net neutrality,” at the expense of consumers and other businesses. Government has a terrible record of picking winners and losers. Besides, much of the reason the Internet has succeeded so far is precisely because it has not been regulated. Net neutrality regulations, designed to solve a problem covered by other laws, will almost certainly cause a host of new complications.
In other news
- Canadian police thwarted a large terrorist attack on their country with the arrest of 17 suspects on Saturday. As Heritage’s Peter Brookes notes, this should be a wakeup call for American counter-terrorism investigators at the FBI.
- President Bush yesterday called on the Senate to pass a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. “Because families pass along values and shape character, marriage is also critical to the health of society,” he said. “Our policies should aim to strengthen families, not undermine them. And changing the definition of marriage would undermine the family structure.” The Senate is expected to vote on Wednesday.
- The Department of Homeland Security recently announced the distribution of $711 million in antiterrorism grants to governments across the country. Many cities like New York and Washington are facing cuts in their grants, but “that is the way that grants should be allocated,” James Carafano explains. Nevertheless, Congress should investigate the distribution to ensure it was done properly and change the rules if necessary.
- The Supreme Court announced yesterday that it will hear two cases on the use of racial discrimination in public schools to promote diversity.
- The city of New London, CT, formally seized the property of two private landowners in order to make way for a private development. Reversing hundreds of years of tradition, the Supreme Court last year ruled against Michael Cristofaro and Susette Kelo, saying that municipalities may confiscate land under eminent domain for private use.
Coming up at Heritage
To attend these or any other Heritage Foundation events, RSVP at Heritage’s events website. Or you can watch these events live online at Heritage.org. All times are Eastern.
- On Wednesday, June 7 at 10:00am, Heritage’s John Tkacik is joined by former Heritage expert Larry Wortzel of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission and other experts to examine the Pentagon’s newest report on China’s military strength and what that means for American policy.
- On Thursday, June 8 at 11:00am, Heritage regulation expert James Gattuso hosts a panel on providing consumer choice in television and video delivery.
Nathaniel Ward is the Editor of MyHeritage.org—a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation.
